Thursday, January 12, 2006

The Sermon on the Mount

A little while ago, over at Three Nails, I was in a debate with a fellow over the topic of salvation--whether it was by faith alone that we are saved, or if it was by faith and works, in cooperation with God's Grace. I believe that the Bible teaches the latter of these two perspectives, and illustrated my point with a brief outline of Jesus' famous Sermon on the Mount, which tells us how to live for three chapters, but never mentions "faith alone". At the time, I said that I would at a later time go through the Sermon on the Mount more thoroughly, since I thought it would make good material for Youth Group talks. Well, that later time is now, and for the next several weeks, until we're done, I'll be teaching expositorally through Matthew 5-7, with relevant thoughts from the similar record of it in Luke 11. To begin with, and to introduce the subject, I'm going to quote a pertinent chapter from a book that I am currently reading, titled Life of Christ by Fulton J. Sheen.

Two Mounts are related as the first and second acts of a two-act drama: The Mount of the Beatitudes and the Mount of Calvary. He who climbed the first to preach the Beatitudes must necessarily climb the second to practice what He preached. The unthinking often say the Sermon on the Mount constitutes the "essence of Christianity." But let any man put these Beatitudes into practice in his own life, and he too will draw down upon himself the wrath of the world. The Sermon on the Mount cannot be separated from His Crucifixion, any more than day can be separated from night. The day Our Lord taught the Beatitudes, He signed His own death warrant. The sound of nails and hammers digging through human flesh were the echoes thrown back from the mountainside where He told men how to be happy or blessed. Everyone wants to be happy; but His ways were the very opposite of the ways of the world.

One way to make enemies and antagonise people is to challenge the spirit of the world. The world has a spirit, as each age has a spirit. There are certain unanalyzed assumptions which govern the conduct of the world. Anyone who challenges these worldy maxims, such as, "you only live once," "get as much out of life as you can," "who will ever know about it?" "what is sex for if not for pleasure?" is bound to make himself unpopular.

In the Beatitudes, Our Divine Lord takes those eight flimsy catchwords of the world--"Security," "Revenge," "Laughter," "Popularity," "Getting Even," "Sex," "Armed Might," and "Comfort"--and turns them upside down. To those who say, "You cannot be happy unless you are rich," He says, "Blessed are the poor in spirit." To those who say, "Don't let him get away with it," He says, "Blessed are the patient." To those who say, "Laugh and the world laughs with you," He says, "Blessed are those who mourn." To those who say: "If nature gave you sex instincts you ought to give them free expression, otherwise you will become frustrated," He says, "Blessed are the clean of heart." To those who say, "Seek to be popular and well known," He says, "Blessed are you when men revile you and persecute you and speak all manner of evil against you falsely because of Me." To those who say, "In time of peace prepare for war," He says, "Blessed are the peacemakers."

The cheap clichés around which movies are written and novels composed, He scorns. He proposes to burn what they worship; to conquer errant sex instincts instead of allowing them to make slaves of man; to tame economic conquests instead of making happiness consist in an abundance of things external to the soul. All false beatitudes which make happiness depend on self-expression, license, having a good time, or "Eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow you die," He scorns because they bring mental disorders, unhappiness, false hopes, fears, and anxieties.

Those who would escape the impact of the Beatitudes say that Our Divine Savior was a creature of His time, but not of ours, and that, therefore, His words do not apply to us. He was not a creature of His time nor of any time; but we are! Mohammed belonged to his time; hence he said that a man could have concubines in addition to four wives at one time. Mohammed belongs even to our time, because moderns say that a man can have many wives, if he drives them in tandem style, one after another. But Our Lord did not belong to His day, any more than He belonged to ours. To marry one age is to be a widow in the next. Because He suited no age, He was the model for all ages. He never used a phrase that depended on the social order in which He lived; His Gospel was no easier then than it is now. As He put it:
Heaven and earth must disappear sooner than one jot,
..One flourish should disappear from the law;
It must all be accomplished.

...........................Matthew 5:18
...

The Sermon on the Mount is so much at variance with all that our world holds dear that the world will crucify anyone who tries to live up to its values. Because Christ preached them, He had to die. Calvary was the price He paid for the Sermon on the Mount. Only mediocrity survives. Those who call black black, and white white, are sentenced for intolerance. Only the grays live.

Let Him who says, "Blessed are the poor in spirit," come into the world that believes in the primacy of the economic; let Him stand in the market place where some men live for collective profit, and others say men live for individual profit, and see what happens. He will be so poor that during His life He will have nowhere to lay His head; a day will come when He will die without anything of economic worth. In His last hour He will be so impoverished that they will strip Him of His garments and even give Him a stranger's grave for His burial, as He had had a stranger's stable for His birth.

Let Him come into the world which proclaims the gospel of the strong, advocates hating our enemies, an condemns Christian virtues as the "soft" virtues, and say to that world, "Blessed are the patient," and He will one day feel the scourges of the strong barbarians laid across His back; He will be struck on the cheek by a mocking fist during one of His trials; He will see men take a sickle and cut the grass from a hill on Calvary, and then use a hammer to pinion Him to a Cross to test the patience of One Who endures the worst that evil has to offer, that having exhausted itself it might eventually turn to Love.

Let Him come into our world which ridicules the idea of sin as morbidity, considers reparation for past guilt as a guilt complex and preach to that world, "Blessed are they who mourn" for their sins; and He will be blindfolded and mocked as a fool. They will take His Body and scourge it, until His bones can be numbered; they will crown His head with thorns, until He begins to weep not salt tears but crimson beads of blood, as they laugh at the weakness of Him Who will not come down from the Cross.

Let Him come into the world which denies Absolute Truth, which says that right and wrong are only questions of point of view, that we must be broadminded about virtue and vice, and let Him say, "Blessed are they who hunger and thirst after holiness," that is, after the Absolute, after the Truth which "I am"; and they will in their broadmindedness give the mob the choice of Him or Barabbas; they will crucify Him with thieves, and try to make the world believe that God is no different from a batch of robbers who are His bedfellows in death.

Let Him come into a world which says that "my neighbor is hell," that all which is opposite me is nothing, that the ego alone matters, that my will is supreme law, that what I decide is good, that I must forget others and think only of myself, and say to them, "Blessed are the merciful." He will find that He will receive no mercy; they will open five streams of blood out of His Body; they will pour vinegar and gall into His thirsting mouth; and, even after His death, be so merciless as to plunge a spear into His Sacred Heart.

Let Him come into a world that tries to interpret man in terms of sex; which regards purity as coldness, chastity as frustrated sex, self-containment as abnormality, and the union of husband and wife until death as boredom; which says that a marriage endures only so long as the glands endure, that one may unbind what God binds and unseal what God seals. Say to them, "Blessed are the pure"; and He will find Himself hanging naked on a Cross, made a spectacle to men and angels in a last wild crazy affirmation that purity is abnormal, the virgins are neurotics, and that carnality is right.

Let Him come into a world which believes that one must resort to every manner of chicanery and duplicity in order to conquer the world, carrying doves of peace with stomachs full of bombs, and say to them, "Blessed are the peacemakers," or "Blessed are they who eradicate sin that there may be peace"; and He will find Himself surrounded by men engaged in the silliest of all wars--a war against the Son of God; making violence with steel and wood, pinions and gall and then setting a watch over His grave that He who lost the battle might not win the day.

Let Him come into a world that believes that our whole life should be geared to flattering and influencing people for the sake of utility and popularity, and say to them: "Blessed are you when men hate, persecute, and revile you"; and He will find Himself without a friend in the world, an outcast on a hill, with mobs shouting His death, and His flesh hanging from Him like purple rags.

The Beatitudes cannot be taken alone: they are not ideals; they are hard facts and realities inseparable from the Cross of Calvary. What He taught was self-crucifixion: to love those who hate us; to pluck out eyes and cut off arms in order to prevent sinning; to be clean on the inside when the passions clamor for satisfaction on the outside; to forgive those who would put us to death; to overcome evil with good; to bless those who curse us; to stop mouthing freedom until we have justice, truth and love of God in our hearts as the condition of freedom; to live in the world and still keep oneself unpolluted from it; to deny ourselves sometimes legitimate pleasures in order the better to crucify our egotism--all this is to sentence the old man in us to death....

On the Mount of the Beatitudes, He bade men hurl themselves on the cross of self-denial; on the Mount of Calvary, He embraced that very cross. Though the shadow of the Cross would not fall across the place of the skull until three years later, it was already in His Heart the day He preached on "How to be Happy."

_______
Sheen, Rev. Fulton J., Ph.D., D.D. Life of Christ. (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.: New York, 1958). Pp. 115-116, 119-121, 122.

Labels: , ,

7 Comments:

Blogger Gregory said...

What are you talking about?! You just have no respect!

Weren't there enough pictures for you?

Dez thought it was cool.

And they clapped for me when I read it at St. Luke's. Maybe I should read it out loud to you?

Come on, Matt! This is the opposite of boring! This is the very life-changing, nay, world-changing message of the Gospel!

Read it again! Let it challenge you.

2:25 p.m., January 15, 2006  
Blogger Dez said...

For the record, when I said 'cool' I was referring to what Matt said. But yes, Greg's little talk (well, ripped off talk from his book =P) was quite good which the students of St. Luke enjoyed...although, the students of St. Luke also enjoy sniffing wite-out... Any way, yeah, good one Greg.

5:23 p.m., January 16, 2006  
Blogger Eric said...

Yo, Greg!
I got the Lazarus(my compy) back!
And on a side note, we (Dez, Yourself, and I) should hangout sometime.

-Eric

10:31 a.m., January 22, 2006  
Blogger Gregory said...

Yeah, we should.
BTW, I responded to your comment in the Q&A. Let me know.

12:03 p.m., January 23, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am humbled.

Let me know when you're done the book, Gregory. I would very much like to read it. Actually, I will go find it at the KPL -- hopefully, they have it!

Perhaps you could explain why you think Christ should have made mention of salvation through faith alone in the Beatitudes; your opening comments imply that sola fide must be wrong because Christ didn't mention it in the beatitudes. I'm not sure this is a) logical, or b) Scriptural. Then again, I don't know your reason for making the statement (other than making reference to your debate), so I can't really assert a, or b.

I'll wait for your response.

In the meanwhile, God bless you and Melissa, and I'll give you a call in the next few days. We should catch up. Sarah and I miss you and Melissa.

God bless you,
Christopher

7:54 p.m., January 24, 2006  
Blogger Gregory said...

Hey Chris! Hope to hear from you soon!

My small print reference to the debate with Jacob, and the fact that Jesus never once mentions "faith" as a requirement for salvation in the Beatitudes, was referring to Jacob's argument in his Debate Part 6, where he said in response to Jon (another Catholic who was involved for a while)'s claim that Faith and works were always linked in the Bible's view of salvation, Jacob said that it was "a flat-out lie," cited many passages where salvation was allegedly mentioned without reference to "works", and then said, "There is much more scripture that could be given, but the point is, if baptism or any other work were truly necessary for salvation, it would be emphatically emphasized every single time the gospel is mentioned. However, clearly, it is not. But what is mentioned in every instance of the gospel being explained in scripture? FAITH!" (emphasis in original)

It was this post that prompted my lengthly, thoroughly biblical, and unanswered reply, Was (or is) the Reformation Necessary? An examination of Protestantism’s doctrinal Pillars: Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide -- 7/Sola Fide--Part 1, in which I provided no less than 15 texts that specifically mention salvation in terms of works, without mentioning faith. Upon further reflection, I realised that I had omitted a slam-dunk passage of Scripture, "The Sermon on the Mount", Matthew chapters 5-7. As such, I addended it to the post, going through a brief outline of the Sermon in the comments to Part 7. I stated in those comments, "Now, I'm not going to go through here and exegete the entire three chapters (maybe I'll do that at Grace for the Wayward Heart soon, though), but I will simply say that in three chapters of Jesus proclaiming the Kingdom of God and what it takes to get there (That's 111 verses of teaching!) not once does Jesus talk about faith! Not once! (Again, emphasis in orginal).

All this is to say, that I don't think that Jesus needed to mention faith in the context of The Sermon on the Mount, because faith was assumed for anyone to even undertake the demands of such a revolutionary standard! However, it was Jacob's absurdly illogical assertion that for something to be deemed Scripturally necessary for Salvation, it must be "emphatically emphasised" every time that Salvation is mentioned, that prompted my recent close examination of the Sermon on the Mount (which only really began making any sense to me when I dropped the "Faith Alone" beliefs that I had grown up with--which I acknowledge was a different understanding than your own, Chris, but was akin to Jacob's).

As such, the preface to this post was just to set the backdrop and let everyone know that here was, finally, the fruit of my self-imposed duty to present a more thorough exposition of Jesus' Sermon on the Mount.

I hope that clears up any misapprehensions you had in reading it. To wit, it would certainly be illogical to assert that Faith Alone is false simply because Jesus didn't mention it here. Rather, I was saying that the opposite opinion was false (that "faith + works" isn't true because it isn't mentioned every time that salvation is mentioned) by demonstrating the error of the logic which you point out.

Ironically, you thoughtfully refrained from accusing me of the same error that my whole reason for citing the Sermon on the Mount was refuting in Jacob's argumentation.

So thanks for proving my point :)

1:52 p.m., January 25, 2006  
Blogger Eric said...

And I'm still the best looking one here.

Oh, yeah. New post over at the old dailydisciple.blogspot.com

Word,
Eric

1:12 a.m., January 28, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home